Before reading this assignment, I had no idea such a week existed. So going into it I thought it would be a good idea to research and find out what exactly it means to be “media literate”. By definition, media literacy is the ability access, analyze, evaluate, and create media in all its forms (television, print, billboard etc.). To be literate we have to understand our role as well as our relationship with the media in order to be a wise consumer, and good citizen.
To be media literate, we must understand a few things about the message.
We need to know:
Who sent the message?
The population needs to know who the author of this message is
What techniques were used to draw your attention?
Understanding what the message did to grab your attention is vital. Media is a beautiful thing so it could be something that was visually appealing, or just a hilarious line.
How can the message be misinterpreted?
Knowing that people view different things in different ways, we must be able to look at the message from another angle. For example, the Bud Light commercial our media class witnessed at the beginning of the year is a prime example of how a message can be misunderstood. Some of us may look at the commercial as a comical time line of men getting away from their wives to hang out with the guys, but others may see it as offensive, and get the message that throughout history men have been able to create events and objects to “out fox” their wives. The second approach is where heated debates come about. And finally there are those who take it for what it is, another beer commercial trying to get a cheap laugh (which generally works).
And finally,
We need to understand WHY the message was sent?
All media organizations are organized to gain profit, power, or awareness. Profit is very important to most companies, and I don’t think I need to explain why. Power is second to profit; many media organizations pride themselves in being able to manipulate consumers into doing exactly what they want. And lastly, gaining awareness is also why a message would be sent, whether it be a new ipod product, or a M.A.D.D commercial.
Knowing these things prior to media education week was essential for me. I felt that I was a pretty comfortable recognizing what the media wants from me exactly. Asking myself these questions helped me look at things from different angles and actually ended up with more questions than I had before.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
National Media Education Week
National Media Education Week
Media Hememonies: Who owns What?
Media Hegemonies: Mapping who owns what
For this blog entry, I thought back to when we had a class discussion on who exactly owns Google, what does Google own, and how does Google become a profitable organization.Google is an amazing success story, created as a research project in 1996 by Stanford graduates. It has come a long way since then, as millions of people around the world recognize this site as their "go to" spot to find what exactly they are after. No longer do we search on the internet, we now "Google it". It is imperative in many people’s lives, including mine, who used GOOGLE to research this very blog I am writing (ironic much?) Google is said to own 500 domain names according to mydigmedia.com. The list of what exactly Google owns is below:
Deja.com
Pyra Labs-Blogger
Neotonic Software-for CRMApplied Semantics-for search
Kaltix Corp-for context sensitve search
Genius Labs-for bloggingIgnite Logic-web templates for law firms
Picassa-digi photo management
Keyhole Group-digital mapping
Where 2 Technologies-digital mapping
ZipDash-maps and traffic for mobile devices2
Web Technologies-spreadsheets
Urchin-metrics/analytics
Dodgeball-mobile social networking
Reqwireless Inc.-Java browser
Current Communications Group-broadband internet
Android-software for mobile phone o/s
Transformic Inc-search engine for deep/invisible webSkia-graphics software engineering
DMarc Broadcasting-digital radio broadcasting
Measure Map-analytics for blogs
Upstartle-Writely, document editor for the web
@Last Software-SketchUp 3D modeling
Orion-Referral search engine
Neven Vision-automatic information extraction from jpgs
Jotspot Ind-wiki platform for websites
YouTube-online video company
Endoxen-geomapping software
Xunlei-filesharing app for the web
Adscape Media-in-game advertising
Gapminder's Trendalyzer-presentation software
Doubleclick-ad platform for the web
Tonic Systems-document conversion technology
Marratech-video conferencing technology
Green Border Technologies-secure web browsing tech
Panoramio-photo site sharing for Google EarthFeedbumer-RSS feed distribution analytics and managementGrandCentral-mobile voice managementPostini-communications security and compliance
Now seeing what exactly Google owns is great, but 99% of those companies I have never heard of, nor used, so how the hell does Google turn a profit? And the answer to that from what I research was advertising. In fact, 99% of its annual revenue is from advertising. From what I can comprehend, Google receives money for each “click” or “hit” it receives from any given site. The money received may vary from a few cents, to a few dollars per click.
I am not sure if there are any negative implications of Google becoming what it has become. I believe it is amazing what they have accomplished. To be recognized as one of the world’s most successful organizations, as well as being voted best company to work for is difficult to achieve. I feel if Google can continue to provide their service as a reliable search engine, nothing negative can come of it.
For this blog entry, I thought back to when we had a class discussion on who exactly owns Google, what does Google own, and how does Google become a profitable organization.Google is an amazing success story, created as a research project in 1996 by Stanford graduates. It has come a long way since then, as millions of people around the world recognize this site as their "go to" spot to find what exactly they are after. No longer do we search on the internet, we now "Google it". It is imperative in many people’s lives, including mine, who used GOOGLE to research this very blog I am writing (ironic much?) Google is said to own 500 domain names according to mydigmedia.com. The list of what exactly Google owns is below:
Deja.com
Pyra Labs-Blogger
Neotonic Software-for CRMApplied Semantics-for search
Kaltix Corp-for context sensitve search
Genius Labs-for bloggingIgnite Logic-web templates for law firms
Picassa-digi photo management
Keyhole Group-digital mapping
Where 2 Technologies-digital mapping
ZipDash-maps and traffic for mobile devices2
Web Technologies-spreadsheets
Urchin-metrics/analytics
Dodgeball-mobile social networking
Reqwireless Inc.-Java browser
Current Communications Group-broadband internet
Android-software for mobile phone o/s
Transformic Inc-search engine for deep/invisible webSkia-graphics software engineering
DMarc Broadcasting-digital radio broadcasting
Measure Map-analytics for blogs
Upstartle-Writely, document editor for the web
@Last Software-SketchUp 3D modeling
Orion-Referral search engine
Neven Vision-automatic information extraction from jpgs
Jotspot Ind-wiki platform for websites
YouTube-online video company
Endoxen-geomapping software
Xunlei-filesharing app for the web
Adscape Media-in-game advertising
Gapminder's Trendalyzer-presentation software
Doubleclick-ad platform for the web
Tonic Systems-document conversion technology
Marratech-video conferencing technology
Green Border Technologies-secure web browsing tech
Panoramio-photo site sharing for Google EarthFeedbumer-RSS feed distribution analytics and managementGrandCentral-mobile voice managementPostini-communications security and compliance
Now seeing what exactly Google owns is great, but 99% of those companies I have never heard of, nor used, so how the hell does Google turn a profit? And the answer to that from what I research was advertising. In fact, 99% of its annual revenue is from advertising. From what I can comprehend, Google receives money for each “click” or “hit” it receives from any given site. The money received may vary from a few cents, to a few dollars per click.
I am not sure if there are any negative implications of Google becoming what it has become. I believe it is amazing what they have accomplished. To be recognized as one of the world’s most successful organizations, as well as being voted best company to work for is difficult to achieve. I feel if Google can continue to provide their service as a reliable search engine, nothing negative can come of it.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Buy Nothing Day
Continuous attempts are made to get people around the world to stop something, just for one day. In reality though, it is just a false sense of optimism that a group of people share. It is impossible for everybody around the world to stop doing one thing; turn off the lights for an hour, don’t drive for a day, or even something as simple as buy nothing for 24 hours. In the grand scheme of things, it shouldn’t be a challenge to avoid consumerism, yet the world is continuously disproving this point.
Admittedly over 65 nations participate in this idea, yet how many people really participate? None of my friends were even aware of this idea, leading me to believe that “Buy Nothing Day” isn’t a very strong protest against consumerism. Sure, there are groups on Facebook, posters hung right below signs advocating the voice of Jesus, and random people preaching the horrors of consumerism, but really these aren’t helping. People have become attuned to ignoring simple posters and people waving sheets of cardboard covered in Magic Marker, there has to be a new way to get the idea out there.
Unfortunately, battling an idea such as consumerism is going to take a lot more effort – taking something out of everybody’s day-to-day life is no easy feat. If I am to ever take this notion seriously, something drastic has to be done about the presentation of the idea. Get more people involved, get higher organizations included with the ideas, but most of all, make it last longer than one day. Cutting consumerism out of your life for a day will not change anything, it will give people a sense of false hope that they are succeeding but that is where it ends. It has to last longer than 24 hours for anybody to take it seriously, once this group can put these notions into effect, more people can finally take this idea seriously
Admittedly over 65 nations participate in this idea, yet how many people really participate? None of my friends were even aware of this idea, leading me to believe that “Buy Nothing Day” isn’t a very strong protest against consumerism. Sure, there are groups on Facebook, posters hung right below signs advocating the voice of Jesus, and random people preaching the horrors of consumerism, but really these aren’t helping. People have become attuned to ignoring simple posters and people waving sheets of cardboard covered in Magic Marker, there has to be a new way to get the idea out there.
Unfortunately, battling an idea such as consumerism is going to take a lot more effort – taking something out of everybody’s day-to-day life is no easy feat. If I am to ever take this notion seriously, something drastic has to be done about the presentation of the idea. Get more people involved, get higher organizations included with the ideas, but most of all, make it last longer than one day. Cutting consumerism out of your life for a day will not change anything, it will give people a sense of false hope that they are succeeding but that is where it ends. It has to last longer than 24 hours for anybody to take it seriously, once this group can put these notions into effect, more people can finally take this idea seriously
Media image : Hydroxicut Weight Loss Suplement

This is a magazine advertisement that is very common in popular magazines throughout Canada and the U.S. This ad is promoting yet another weight loss product that claims to have fast, effective results with minimal side effects.
You can easily find this ad or a similar ad in magazines such as People, US weekly, Men’s Health or Cosmopolitan. This is prime location for this advertisement because it covers a wide target market. For those who read fashion or magazines about celebrity gossip, and see this ad, it may encourage them to try this product so maybe they can fit into that size 0 dress they always wanted from Guess. And it is also a perfect ad to be placed in any health magazine, because you now have revealed this product to those who are health conscious, but may want to lose a bit of weight. In North American culture we are exposed to these types of ads everywhere we look.
Media has brainwashed us to believe we are not good enough the way we are, and especially target teenagers due to their vulnerability. Personally, I see this ad and laugh. In the before picture, we see an image of a man who looks to be about average, but is alone and obviously not happy with his physique. Then we see the after image, and look at those “results”. In just 8 weeks we can all have great abs, a tan, a new haircut, and a Carmen Electra look alike on our side. It just goes to show how happy anyone can be if we just try this weight loss product. Sadly, millions will buy into this thinking they will be able to be as happy as this chap.
Media has brainwashed us to believe we are not good enough the way we are, and especially target teenagers due to their vulnerability. Personally, I see this ad and laugh. In the before picture, we see an image of a man who looks to be about average, but is alone and obviously not happy with his physique. Then we see the after image, and look at those “results”. In just 8 weeks we can all have great abs, a tan, a new haircut, and a Carmen Electra look alike on our side. It just goes to show how happy anyone can be if we just try this weight loss product. Sadly, millions will buy into this thinking they will be able to be as happy as this chap.
Culture Jamming
Culture Jamming: Whirl Mart
So to be honest I had no idea what exactly culture jamming was, and so I did a bit of research I found it is actually many things and can be defined many ways.
I have selected a culture jamming example known as “Whirl Mart”. The “Whirl Mart” ritual was created in 2001 in response to Adbusters magazine’s call for foolish action on the first day of April (fools day). What started as a very small act in Troy, New York, has spread worldwide. Whirl Mart is a culture jamming ritual targeted towards big box stores such as Wal-mart, K-mart, or Zellers. Those who participate in this ritual define it as an art or action. The participants gather at the superstore, and slowly/silently push empty shopping carts throughout the store. The participants will not purchase any items in the store, and often will attempt to get others in the store to do the same.
Those who engage in this activity claim their actions are “a collective reclamation of space that is otherwise only used for buying and selling”.Those involved are advised to not describe their actions as a protest. They simply wish to spread knowledge about consumption awareness, and want to look around to see if they want to actually do any shopping. Since this is a non-violent form of protesting, there is not much these mega stores can do. They are not harming anyone, but do occasionally get asked to leave. Police have shown up once, and only formally warned them, but this was seen as a good thing to the “whirlers” as it only strengthened their performance. Whirler’s main goal is to utilize strategies of occupation and reclamation of consumer-dominated space for the purpose of displaying a meaningful spectacle.
It would not surprise me if I heard of any of these acts happening in Guelph, primarily at the Guelph Wal-Mart. I say this because activists in the region fought long and hard for the city to not allow a Wal-Mart to be located in Guelph. After over a decade of being able to resist the stores entry in the community, the battle was finally lost. This is why I would not be surprised if the Guelph Wal-Mart deals with “whirlers” from time to time.
So to be honest I had no idea what exactly culture jamming was, and so I did a bit of research I found it is actually many things and can be defined many ways.
I have selected a culture jamming example known as “Whirl Mart”. The “Whirl Mart” ritual was created in 2001 in response to Adbusters magazine’s call for foolish action on the first day of April (fools day). What started as a very small act in Troy, New York, has spread worldwide. Whirl Mart is a culture jamming ritual targeted towards big box stores such as Wal-mart, K-mart, or Zellers. Those who participate in this ritual define it as an art or action. The participants gather at the superstore, and slowly/silently push empty shopping carts throughout the store. The participants will not purchase any items in the store, and often will attempt to get others in the store to do the same.
Those who engage in this activity claim their actions are “a collective reclamation of space that is otherwise only used for buying and selling”.Those involved are advised to not describe their actions as a protest. They simply wish to spread knowledge about consumption awareness, and want to look around to see if they want to actually do any shopping. Since this is a non-violent form of protesting, there is not much these mega stores can do. They are not harming anyone, but do occasionally get asked to leave. Police have shown up once, and only formally warned them, but this was seen as a good thing to the “whirlers” as it only strengthened their performance. Whirler’s main goal is to utilize strategies of occupation and reclamation of consumer-dominated space for the purpose of displaying a meaningful spectacle.
It would not surprise me if I heard of any of these acts happening in Guelph, primarily at the Guelph Wal-Mart. I say this because activists in the region fought long and hard for the city to not allow a Wal-Mart to be located in Guelph. After over a decade of being able to resist the stores entry in the community, the battle was finally lost. This is why I would not be surprised if the Guelph Wal-Mart deals with “whirlers” from time to time.
Net Neutrality
Net neutrality is a standard principle that is applied to broadband networks, and possibly all networks. Neutral broadband networks are those free of restrictions on types of equipment that may be attached, on the types of communications allowed, which does not restrict content, sites or platforms.In this battle of rights, there are two sides. One side is known as the “pay for use” and the opposing side is the “equal access”.
The pay for use group argues that many types of traffic differentially affect the network, and therefore should have the ability to charge for higher-impact traffic. This can be compared to the way postal services charge more for heavier packages, compared to small letters or even how highway tolls charge more for transport trucks in comparison to a family sedan.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, we have the equal access group. They claim there should be no discrimination based on what the traffic, or which direction the traffic is headed. Their argument is that the same postal service does not charge any additional charge for a car payment, compared to a birthday card. They say no one has the right to charge more for yahoo clicks or hotmail hits.
The most important feature of this conflict is who is entitled to control ones internet activity? Regulations set in place to mandate net neutrality have been debated for some time now with no real answer to who is in control of our activity on the web.
So in this heated debate, who is right? Well, both sides are. Specific types of activity (voice, video and interactive applications) do in fact stress the network, and severely impacts last-mile broadband links (where congestion is common). But having telcos (pay for use) dedicating themselves to some sites over others contradicts several centuries of historical net neutrality.
The pay for use group argues that many types of traffic differentially affect the network, and therefore should have the ability to charge for higher-impact traffic. This can be compared to the way postal services charge more for heavier packages, compared to small letters or even how highway tolls charge more for transport trucks in comparison to a family sedan.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, we have the equal access group. They claim there should be no discrimination based on what the traffic, or which direction the traffic is headed. Their argument is that the same postal service does not charge any additional charge for a car payment, compared to a birthday card. They say no one has the right to charge more for yahoo clicks or hotmail hits.
The most important feature of this conflict is who is entitled to control ones internet activity? Regulations set in place to mandate net neutrality have been debated for some time now with no real answer to who is in control of our activity on the web.
So in this heated debate, who is right? Well, both sides are. Specific types of activity (voice, video and interactive applications) do in fact stress the network, and severely impacts last-mile broadband links (where congestion is common). But having telcos (pay for use) dedicating themselves to some sites over others contradicts several centuries of historical net neutrality.
Friday, November 21, 2008
The Ecology of Media
The Ecology of Media : The Invention of the Computer
The invention of the computer has had an impact in North American culture ever since they have been released on the market. It is arguable when the first computer was invented, but to my knowledge, the first computer that resembled a modern day computer was mid-twentieth century (1940-1945).The original purpose of the computer was to calculate data that humans could not process and were massive compared to what we have access to today (back then computers were about the size of a room). The original purpose and functions of the computer have changed drastically, and are continuing to evolve even today. Back then, processing numerical data was a computers main purpose, and it had very limited functions. Today it is difficult to determine a computers main purpose and function, and it may vary well depend on who you ask. Since this is my blog, I will assume you wish to know what I feel the real purpose and functions are of a modern day computer.
I feel the sole purpose of a computer today is to have the ability to be interconnected to the world around us. It is amazing to think and hard for me to admit how I rarely use the computer for its original purpose. It seems aside from school work, I do very little that is productive on the computer, and I believe I am not the only one (I hope anyways). The computers functions have also drastically changed over the years. Its functions have come a long way when you realize how limited its abilities were in the past, compared to today, where we can have computers in items the size of a watch, and have computers in kid’s toys. In my opinion the computers primary function is to be able to access the internet. So many people depend on this function, which is why I would argue that a computer must be capable of allowing us to connect to the outside world. To sum everything up, the computer at one time had very useful purposes and functions for its time, where now we see the abilities are never ending, but all for stuff that is not so meaningful.
The invention of the computer has had an impact in North American culture ever since they have been released on the market. It is arguable when the first computer was invented, but to my knowledge, the first computer that resembled a modern day computer was mid-twentieth century (1940-1945).The original purpose of the computer was to calculate data that humans could not process and were massive compared to what we have access to today (back then computers were about the size of a room). The original purpose and functions of the computer have changed drastically, and are continuing to evolve even today. Back then, processing numerical data was a computers main purpose, and it had very limited functions. Today it is difficult to determine a computers main purpose and function, and it may vary well depend on who you ask. Since this is my blog, I will assume you wish to know what I feel the real purpose and functions are of a modern day computer.
I feel the sole purpose of a computer today is to have the ability to be interconnected to the world around us. It is amazing to think and hard for me to admit how I rarely use the computer for its original purpose. It seems aside from school work, I do very little that is productive on the computer, and I believe I am not the only one (I hope anyways). The computers functions have also drastically changed over the years. Its functions have come a long way when you realize how limited its abilities were in the past, compared to today, where we can have computers in items the size of a watch, and have computers in kid’s toys. In my opinion the computers primary function is to be able to access the internet. So many people depend on this function, which is why I would argue that a computer must be capable of allowing us to connect to the outside world. To sum everything up, the computer at one time had very useful purposes and functions for its time, where now we see the abilities are never ending, but all for stuff that is not so meaningful.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
A day in the Life : A Media Blog
A day in the Life: A media Blog
I finally got a day where I had the opportunity to document the media I encounter in an average day. So bare with me as I must admit I do not live the most exciting life. I woke up Sunday morning and proceeded with my usual routine. I like to get a coffee every morning, but not just any old cup of Joe will do, I need to have Tim hormones in my gut. Perhaps this was the first example of how the media has impacted my life. I am unable to settle for anything but the "best", and arguably the most dominant coffee chains in the world. The companies with the most money have the ability to produce commercials that become imbedded in our minds, especially when we see this commercial upwards of 3 times a day. I dragged myself to the UC and got my timmies, and enjoyed it there. As I looked around, I saw a lot of advertisements for Rogers’s communication. During orientation week, Rogers was all over campus promoting their wireless, internet, and home packages. It is pretty well know that Rogers has a communication tower on U of G campus, which kills almost all of Bell and Telus’ signal. Sadly, I have bought into Rogers. As much as I hate them, I still choose them. This was possibly my second major encounter of the day that really had me thinking.
I then proceeded back to my room where I engaged in about 5 straight hours of NFL football coverage. Football is a sport with one target market. Macho, pompous men who will do just about anything to ditch their wives, and watch the game with their buddies. Oh, and get absolutely wasted in the process. It is quiet the tradition. I can’t say I fall into this macho man category and only feel like that that is the NFL’s targeted audience because of the ads they run during their programming. Every ad is either for cars, beer, pizza, or the latest action DVD available on BLU RAY!...Sadly, this is what my peers and I buy into.
Even though we are conscious of the media, and the fact it will attempt to manipulate us, we buy into it. I wish I could change this, and some days I do feel like I do a good job of ignoring the media, but the fact is it’s everywhere and is unavoidable.
I finally got a day where I had the opportunity to document the media I encounter in an average day. So bare with me as I must admit I do not live the most exciting life. I woke up Sunday morning and proceeded with my usual routine. I like to get a coffee every morning, but not just any old cup of Joe will do, I need to have Tim hormones in my gut. Perhaps this was the first example of how the media has impacted my life. I am unable to settle for anything but the "best", and arguably the most dominant coffee chains in the world. The companies with the most money have the ability to produce commercials that become imbedded in our minds, especially when we see this commercial upwards of 3 times a day. I dragged myself to the UC and got my timmies, and enjoyed it there. As I looked around, I saw a lot of advertisements for Rogers’s communication. During orientation week, Rogers was all over campus promoting their wireless, internet, and home packages. It is pretty well know that Rogers has a communication tower on U of G campus, which kills almost all of Bell and Telus’ signal. Sadly, I have bought into Rogers. As much as I hate them, I still choose them. This was possibly my second major encounter of the day that really had me thinking.
I then proceeded back to my room where I engaged in about 5 straight hours of NFL football coverage. Football is a sport with one target market. Macho, pompous men who will do just about anything to ditch their wives, and watch the game with their buddies. Oh, and get absolutely wasted in the process. It is quiet the tradition. I can’t say I fall into this macho man category and only feel like that that is the NFL’s targeted audience because of the ads they run during their programming. Every ad is either for cars, beer, pizza, or the latest action DVD available on BLU RAY!...Sadly, this is what my peers and I buy into.
Even though we are conscious of the media, and the fact it will attempt to manipulate us, we buy into it. I wish I could change this, and some days I do feel like I do a good job of ignoring the media, but the fact is it’s everywhere and is unavoidable.
Monday, October 6, 2008
The American Election
The American Presidential Election
First of all, I find it funny how there is also an upcoming Canadian election yet we are writing about the American election. Does what happens down there really affect us north of the border? The answer my dear friend, is yes. Sadly enough I must admit I am way more involved and interested in American politics than I am about Canadian politics. I don’t know exactly why this is, but it seems like I’m not the only one who seems to care more about what’s happening down south, instead of what’s going on in our own backyard.
As Canadians, we rely on the U.S because they are no doubt our strongest trading partner and essentially what makes our economy function. If George Bush woke up one morning and said “hey, let’s stop trading with those Canadians”, our economy would plummet and I’m not sure if it would be able to bounce back. So naturally Canadians are concerned about what will happen with our neighbors because if their economy is in a crisis, it will reflect in our own country.
Americans have been jerked around for the past 8 years. They have been lied to and just flat out tricked. I did tune into the first Presidential debate and must say it actually is pretty entertaining. I found it to be both educational and comical. I have supported Obama throughout his campaign, and he looked very sharp on the night of the debate. I feel that Obama has a realistic plan to dig his country out of the whole Bush left them in and feel Obama should be the next president. Obama has given millions of Americans some piece of hope, and a reason to be a bit more optimistic.
First of all, I find it funny how there is also an upcoming Canadian election yet we are writing about the American election. Does what happens down there really affect us north of the border? The answer my dear friend, is yes. Sadly enough I must admit I am way more involved and interested in American politics than I am about Canadian politics. I don’t know exactly why this is, but it seems like I’m not the only one who seems to care more about what’s happening down south, instead of what’s going on in our own backyard.
As Canadians, we rely on the U.S because they are no doubt our strongest trading partner and essentially what makes our economy function. If George Bush woke up one morning and said “hey, let’s stop trading with those Canadians”, our economy would plummet and I’m not sure if it would be able to bounce back. So naturally Canadians are concerned about what will happen with our neighbors because if their economy is in a crisis, it will reflect in our own country.
Americans have been jerked around for the past 8 years. They have been lied to and just flat out tricked. I did tune into the first Presidential debate and must say it actually is pretty entertaining. I found it to be both educational and comical. I have supported Obama throughout his campaign, and he looked very sharp on the night of the debate. I feel that Obama has a realistic plan to dig his country out of the whole Bush left them in and feel Obama should be the next president. Obama has given millions of Americans some piece of hope, and a reason to be a bit more optimistic.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
We are at War
We Are at War
When asked about my response on this topic, I had to think twice. Not so much about my overall response, but just how I would express it. My politically correct side would say “this was a mistake that has had an impact on everyone”, but my Italian side wants to say “this is bullshit”. What good has come from this war? What were the Americans fighting for anyways? To me, there has just been too many conspiracies and evidence that has lead to me believe George W. Bush was in on this all along. September 11th was a terrifying and tragic day that has changed our lives forever. We all remember where we were, and what we were doing when we got the news of America being under attack. If you look back in time, you would be able to tell Americans are not ones to be pushed around. So was it a suprise when they declared war?
Since American, Canadian, and British troops have been deployed in Iraq, thousands of innocent civilians and soldiers have been killed, and not a damn thing has been resolved or accomplished. This entire presidency has been drama and controversy from day one. It is evident that the American population has come to realize they got played for fools. On almost every late night television program (Letterman, Leno, Conan O’Brien etc.) there is a segment dedicated to joking about or insulting their lame duck president.
I just feel really bitter about this entire war because prior to September 11th, it seemed like life was good. The economy was fairly stable, you could afford to vacation, and life wasn’t as stressful. Now, we are in the midst of a recession and just witnessed the largest single day crash in the stock markets. It all seems like this all could have been avoided. I do pay attention to American politics via Steven Colbert, John Stewart and mainstream American news and wish the best for their county. I wish this for them not only because we as Canadians heavily rely on them as trading partners, but because their population needs a break from the bull crap that has occurred the past 8 years of their lives.
When asked about my response on this topic, I had to think twice. Not so much about my overall response, but just how I would express it. My politically correct side would say “this was a mistake that has had an impact on everyone”, but my Italian side wants to say “this is bullshit”. What good has come from this war? What were the Americans fighting for anyways? To me, there has just been too many conspiracies and evidence that has lead to me believe George W. Bush was in on this all along. September 11th was a terrifying and tragic day that has changed our lives forever. We all remember where we were, and what we were doing when we got the news of America being under attack. If you look back in time, you would be able to tell Americans are not ones to be pushed around. So was it a suprise when they declared war?
Since American, Canadian, and British troops have been deployed in Iraq, thousands of innocent civilians and soldiers have been killed, and not a damn thing has been resolved or accomplished. This entire presidency has been drama and controversy from day one. It is evident that the American population has come to realize they got played for fools. On almost every late night television program (Letterman, Leno, Conan O’Brien etc.) there is a segment dedicated to joking about or insulting their lame duck president.
I just feel really bitter about this entire war because prior to September 11th, it seemed like life was good. The economy was fairly stable, you could afford to vacation, and life wasn’t as stressful. Now, we are in the midst of a recession and just witnessed the largest single day crash in the stock markets. It all seems like this all could have been avoided. I do pay attention to American politics via Steven Colbert, John Stewart and mainstream American news and wish the best for their county. I wish this for them not only because we as Canadians heavily rely on them as trading partners, but because their population needs a break from the bull crap that has occurred the past 8 years of their lives.
Buy Nothing Day
Buy Nothing Day
I have never heard of such a day until reading about it here, but it actually seems like a good idea. I looked into this immediately to see how those would cope without buying anything. I viewed a blog page (same one as mine!) that was dedicated to sharing ideas and posts on what they would do on this occasion. Ideas such as baking, sewing, reading, cooking dinner for the family, and going skating were a few shared ideas on the discussion board. This day sounds like what I say every morning when I wake up. Each day I vow to spend $0, but I never succeed. Being a student, budgeting is a great skill to learn. I have not mastered this art yet.
There needs to be more awareness of over consumption in North America. Americans are only 5% of the total World population, but consume over 30% of its resources. While the world as a whole is consuming at a rate 35% higher than the limit where nature can sustain and regenerate itself.
I’m really glad I this topic was chosen for us students to do as an assignment. I had not heard of this event, and I’m sure I’m not the only one. It is important for us to recognize how good we have it, and how much we take for granted. North Americans have adopted the belief that wealth and consumption is what makes us happy, even when studies have shown it has actually reduced the quality of our lives.
This event got me very interested and doing research about over consumption in the world and I definitely learned some things I was not exposed to before. I will be an active supporter of this day/event.
I have never heard of such a day until reading about it here, but it actually seems like a good idea. I looked into this immediately to see how those would cope without buying anything. I viewed a blog page (same one as mine!) that was dedicated to sharing ideas and posts on what they would do on this occasion. Ideas such as baking, sewing, reading, cooking dinner for the family, and going skating were a few shared ideas on the discussion board. This day sounds like what I say every morning when I wake up. Each day I vow to spend $0, but I never succeed. Being a student, budgeting is a great skill to learn. I have not mastered this art yet.
There needs to be more awareness of over consumption in North America. Americans are only 5% of the total World population, but consume over 30% of its resources. While the world as a whole is consuming at a rate 35% higher than the limit where nature can sustain and regenerate itself.
I’m really glad I this topic was chosen for us students to do as an assignment. I had not heard of this event, and I’m sure I’m not the only one. It is important for us to recognize how good we have it, and how much we take for granted. North Americans have adopted the belief that wealth and consumption is what makes us happy, even when studies have shown it has actually reduced the quality of our lives.
This event got me very interested and doing research about over consumption in the world and I definitely learned some things I was not exposed to before. I will be an active supporter of this day/event.
One Web Day
One Web Day
The internet and all ICT’s have impacted the world in words I cannot describe. But I shall try. I have always been fortunate enough to gain access to the internet. My worst nightmare comprises of me waking up a rainy autumn morning and hearing “there is no more internet…EVER!” on the local news.
I can say with confidence that most of the western world relies heavily upon the internet and ICT’s in everyday life. To imagine a time before Facebook, Ebay, Blackberrys, ipods, or Youtube is crazy to me. My generation has always been exposed to this technology, but can you imagine the culture shock the baby boomers received? I can tell you from experience. My mother still does not know how to work the DVD player. What’s that? Yours doesn’t either? For my generation, not knowing how to use a DVD player is unheard of.
ICT’s are what seems to allow North Americans be organized and function. We live in an era where we rely on our clock radio to wake us up, our blackberry to see what we have on the go for the day, the television to give us the weather and the internet to give us a recap of what happened in last night’s episode of “Lost”. This is all before we leave for work or school in the morning.
The internet and ICT’s have impacted my life tremendously. I am comfortable with the technology surrounding me, but I am also excited to see what the future of technology has in store.
The internet and all ICT’s have impacted the world in words I cannot describe. But I shall try. I have always been fortunate enough to gain access to the internet. My worst nightmare comprises of me waking up a rainy autumn morning and hearing “there is no more internet…EVER!” on the local news.
I can say with confidence that most of the western world relies heavily upon the internet and ICT’s in everyday life. To imagine a time before Facebook, Ebay, Blackberrys, ipods, or Youtube is crazy to me. My generation has always been exposed to this technology, but can you imagine the culture shock the baby boomers received? I can tell you from experience. My mother still does not know how to work the DVD player. What’s that? Yours doesn’t either? For my generation, not knowing how to use a DVD player is unheard of.
ICT’s are what seems to allow North Americans be organized and function. We live in an era where we rely on our clock radio to wake us up, our blackberry to see what we have on the go for the day, the television to give us the weather and the internet to give us a recap of what happened in last night’s episode of “Lost”. This is all before we leave for work or school in the morning.
The internet and ICT’s have impacted my life tremendously. I am comfortable with the technology surrounding me, but I am also excited to see what the future of technology has in store.
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Participatory Journalism
Hello and thank you for taking time to read my blog on Participatory Journalism.
First off, I must mention how insanely easy it was/is to create a personal blog for others to explore. My first step was as simple as finding one of many sites that allows any and everyone to post whatever they feel. Once I located the desired site, all it took was for me to submit an active email address and a name (could be false, if you wanted it to be).
What I found about participatory journalism was how just about anyone can create a website for the world to see. Does this not scare anyone? Or am I alone on this one? Just imagine your worst enemy creating a website about you and sharing that website with your community. Now imagine that your enemy is imposing to be you. One day you could be viewed as a well respected citizen in society, and the next, your reputation can be destroyed.
We are in an era where anything read on the internet is seen to be “credible”. If it’s on the web, it MUST be true! Knowing how easy it is to become a participatory journalist, I feel there should be certain restrictions to avoid any types of damaging ones image.
First off, I must mention how insanely easy it was/is to create a personal blog for others to explore. My first step was as simple as finding one of many sites that allows any and everyone to post whatever they feel. Once I located the desired site, all it took was for me to submit an active email address and a name (could be false, if you wanted it to be).
What I found about participatory journalism was how just about anyone can create a website for the world to see. Does this not scare anyone? Or am I alone on this one? Just imagine your worst enemy creating a website about you and sharing that website with your community. Now imagine that your enemy is imposing to be you. One day you could be viewed as a well respected citizen in society, and the next, your reputation can be destroyed.
We are in an era where anything read on the internet is seen to be “credible”. If it’s on the web, it MUST be true! Knowing how easy it is to become a participatory journalist, I feel there should be certain restrictions to avoid any types of damaging ones image.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)